humiliating concessions city made to maintain "at least poor" and strive for "good" condition in parks by 2006 is notjust semantics, it's an admission of long-term failure; maybe commission candidates will change this, or will they be contentto strive for better parks someday?
Title:
humiliating concessions city made to maintain "at least poor" and strive for "good" condition in parks by 2006 is notjust semantics, it's an admission of long-term failure; maybe commission candidates will change this, or will they be contentto strive for better parks someday?
Name(s):
municipal government
Date:
Friday, March 1, 2002
Locator:
8a:1
Subject(s):
Type:
editorial
User Guide
- Title or Summary: Brief description
- Names: Key persons, places and things
- City: Residence at time of death (obituaries only)
- Date: Date of publication, to help find the article on microfilm
- Locator: Page number, section, and column where article begins on microfilm
- Subject: Type of article or key topics of the article
- Type: Additional type, such as "editorial" for opinion columns
- Annotation: Additional notes about the article, such as a correction.
Additional help and tips for searching